Columbia Finance & Trust Co. v. Purcell
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania
On Motion for New Trial.
1Opinion of the Court
HOLLAND, District Judge.
This note was dated and delivered in Kentucky, and is, as a result, a Kentucky contract. Wharton’s Conflict of Laws (3d Ed.) § 447a. The indorsement, however, of Yarnall was made in Philadelphia, and the law of Pennsylvania governs as to the necessity of showing the plaintiffs exhausted the maker’s resources before proceeding against the indorsers; also the necessity of demand and protest is to be determined by the law of the place where the note was indorsed. Wharton’s Conflict of Law (3d Ed.) §§ 452f, 452b. In Pennsylvania, an irregular indorser, even if he be…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Guernsey v. Imperial Bank of CanadaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1911
- Mayfield v. Equitable Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1924
- Columbia Finance & Trust Co. v. PurcellU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1906