Legal Opinion

Guernsey v. Imperial Bank of Canada

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided May 31, 1911No. 2,907PublishedCited by 9 opinions

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Wyoming. Action by Imperial Bank of Canada against Charles A. Guernsey. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

SANBORN, Circuit Judge.

This is an action by the owner of a promissory note payable in Canada made and indorsed in Illinois to recover the amount due upon the note from the indorser. Presentment, demand, and protest were made, and notice of dishonor was given in compliance with the law of Canada, but the indorser claims, and it is conceded, but neither admitted nor decided, that the notice would have been insufficient to charge the indorser if the note had beer? payable in Illinois. The court below held that the notice was good and rendered a judgment against the indorser. The latter’s counsel…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Swift v. TysonSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
  2. Railroad Co. v. LockwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  3. Burgess v. SeligmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  4. Union National Bank of Chicago v. ChapmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
  5. Independent School Dist. of Sioux City v. RewCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In re the Accounting of SchneiderNew York Surrogate's Court · 1950
  2. Healy-Owen-Hartzell Co. v. Montevideo Farmers & Merchants Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  3. Northwestern Terra Cotta Co. v. CaldwellCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1916
  4. Browns Valley State Bank v. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1916
  5. United States v. Guaranty Trust Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API