Legal Opinion

Roof v. Conway

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided February 10, 1943No. 9229PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Circuit Judge.

Determination of the issues involved on this appeal necessitates disentanglement of intercorporate relationships, and study of the case history of separate but intertwined receiverships. Bringing forward forthwith the background of this complex controversy by chronological narrative of relevant events would seem the best adaptable method of statement of the case.

Before the laws of Ohio required certificates of public convenience and necessity for the operation of motor bus lines, the appellants, Roof, West and Batchick, were engaged in the business of transporting…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Grosjean v. American Press Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Davis v. WakeleeSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. Peck v. JennessSupreme Court of the United States · 1849
  4. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. Minneapolis Civic & Commerce Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  5. Wabash Railroad v. Adelbert College of Western Reserve UniversitySupreme Court of the United States · 1908

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. W. Henry Haile, Receiver-Appellant v. Henderson National Bank, Cleveland J. Bridges and Betty BridgesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
  2. Galella v. OnassisDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1972
  3. Mid-America Tire, Inc. v. PTZ Trading Ltd.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Mid-America Tire v. PTZ TradingOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  5. United States of America and Mortimer Todel, as Receiver of the Funds, Assets and Property of Roosevelt Capital Corporation v. Franklin National BankCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API