Van Guilder v. Glasgow
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
RUBEN CASTILLO, District Judge.
Rocquin Van Guilder (“Plaintiff’), a citizen of Indiana, brings this diversity action against Will County State’s Attorney James W. Glasgow (“Defendant”), alleging a state law claim for malicious prosecution. (R. 1, Compl.) Defendant moves to dismiss under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6), arguing that he is entitled to immunity for the acts alleged in the complaint. (R. 14, Mot. to Dismiss.) For the reasons stated below, the motion is granted.
RELEVANT FACTS
On December 1, 2006, Plaintiff was working as a project…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Buckley v. FitzsimmonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Killingsworth v. HSBC Bank Nevada, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
- Healy v. VaupelIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
- Fritz v. JohnstonIllinois Supreme Court · 2004
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Beaman v. SoukDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 2012
- Dalance Robinson v. Lake County, Illinois, a municipal Corporation, Lauren Callinan, in her official and individual capacity, Ryan Koehl, in his official and individual capacity, Donald Tyer, in his official and individual capacity, Stephen Scheller, in his official and individual capacity, Sheriff John Idleburg, in his official and individual capacity, Lana Lemons, in her official and individual capacityDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2025
- Graves v. Board of Education Plainfield Community Consolidated District 202District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2024
- Vitellaro v. City of Park RidgeDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2025
- Vitellaro v. City of Park RidgeDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2025