Legal Opinion

Hashagen v. Lord

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 13, 2000No. 99-974PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAVENSKI R. SMITH, Justice.

Appellant Joseph Hashagen (“Joseph”) appeals e. alimony modification order of the Pulaski County Chancery Court. Appellee Tracy Hashagen Lord petitioned to have alimony resumed after appellant obtained a bankruptcy discharge of his allocated portion of marital indebtedness. This resulted in the creditors pursuing Appellee Tracy Hashagen Lord for payment of those discharged debts. The trial court granted the petition, and reinstated alimony, finding that the bankruptcy discharge constituted changed circumstances warranting modification. Appellant contends that the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. National Enterprises, Inc. v. ReaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  2. Finnegan v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  3. Luttrell v. City of ConwaySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  4. Morse v. Sentry Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. City of Benton v. Arkansas Soil & Water Conservation CommissionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  2. Baldwin v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API