Legal Opinion · Dissent

In Re Guardianship of Brice

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 6, 1943No. 46134Published

1DissentWenneestrum, J.

(dissenting) — I do not approve of the conclusions reached in the majority opinion and the pronouncements therein made, and therefore respectfully dissent. The filing of a dissent, in the main, is a futile judicial effort. However, justification for the submission of a dissent may be found in one of the following reasons: It often gives the writer an opportunity to use material intended for inclusion in a majority opinion, garnered from sources that were considered authorities prior to the time the majority opinion was filed; it also gives the dissenter an opportunity to publicly indicate…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Easton v. SomervilleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
  2. Bates v. DunhamSupreme Court of Iowa · 1882
  3. Andrew v. Sac County State BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
  4. Des Moines Savings Bank v. KrellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
  5. Bookhart v. YoungloveSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API