Legal Opinion

Crider v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 23, 2017No. SD 34667Published

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAM W. FRANCIS, JR., J.

Cleat Crider (“Crider”), appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 29.151 motion to set aside his conviction for statutory sodomy in the first degree, for which he was- sentenced to 30 years in prison. In one point, Crider asserts the motion court clearly erred in denying his Rule 29.15 motion because trial counsel was ineffective for failing to notify the trial court of juror nondisclosure prior to the hearing on Crider’s motion for new trial. Because the motion court’s decision to deny the post-conviction motion was not clearly erroneous, we affirm.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Charles K. Moore v. State of MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri · 2015
  3. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2005
  4. State of Missouri v. Thomas A. EssSupreme Court of Missouri · 2015
  5. State v. McFaddenSupreme Court of Missouri · 2013

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API