Legal Opinion
Mississippi Bar v. ATTORNEY G.
Mississippi Supreme Court
Decided January 13, 1994No. 93-BD-0301PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
630 So.2d 344 (1994)
THE MISSISSIPPI BAR
v.
ATTORNEY G.
No. 93-BD-0301.
Supreme Court of Mississippi.
January 13, 1994.
Order Correcting Text of Amended Rule 6 March 21, 1994.
Michael B. Martz, Jackson, for petitioner.
John L. Hunter, Cumbest Cumbest Hunter & McCormick, Brent M. Bickham, Pascagoula, for respondent.
En Banc.
PRATHER, Presiding Justice, for the Court:
The issue in this attorney discipline case is whether an attorney may be disbarred under the summary procedure of Rule 6(a) of the Rules of Discipline when there has been a non-adjudication of his guilt of a felony crime, but there has been…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part; Dissent.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In the Matter of Richard A. Thalheim, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
- Delaney v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1966
- Mississippi State Bar v. OdomMississippi Supreme Court · 1990
3Cited by7 opinions
- The Mississippi Bar v. ColemanMississippi Supreme Court · 2002
- In Re SheltonMississippi Supreme Court · 2006
- ATTORNEY U v. the Mississippi BarMississippi Supreme Court · 1996
- Mississippi Bar v. SheltonMississippi Supreme Court · 2003
- Mississippi Bar v. BaldwinMississippi Supreme Court · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.