Legal Opinion

Koterzina v. Copple Chevrolet, Inc.

Nebraska Court of Appeals

Decided April 18, 1995No. A-94-117PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Miller-Lerman, Judge.

State of Nebraska, Second Injury Fund (the Fund), third-party defendant, appeals from an order of the district court for Douglas County holding the Fund liable for interest under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 48-125(2) (Reissue 1993). The order of the district court also held defendant-appellee Copple Chevrolet, Inc. (Copple), liable for interest under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 45-103 (Reissue 1993). Copple filed a cross-appeal, claiming that the award of interest against it was improper. At oral argument, Copple abandoned its cross-appeal without conceding the merits of its cross-appeal.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. In Re Interest of RGNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Anderson v. Nashua Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Powell v. American Charter Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Bituminous Casualty Corp. v. DeyleNebraska Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Sherard v. Bethphage Mission, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1991

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Koterzina v. Copple Chevrolet, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Koterzina v. Copple Chevrolet, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Opinion No. (2003), Nebraska Attorney General Reports2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API