Legal Opinion

Rust v. Schwiening

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 21, 1919No. 10,137PublishedCited by 3 opinions

From Lake Circuit Court; J ohm B. Peterson, Special Judge. Action by William Sehwiening against Henry Rust. From a judgment for plaintiff, the defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtEnloe, J.

—Action by appellee against appellant for damages for assault and battery. The complaint was in one paragraph, to which there was answer in general denial. The cause was submitted to a jury, which found for appellee, and assessed his damages at $350, for which sum the court rendered judgment. Appellant’s motion for a new trial being overruled, he prosecutes this appeal.

The only alleged error appellant has presented for our consideration is the action of the court in overruling his motion for a new trial.

*499The assault and battery complained of took place, •as shown by the record, under the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Martin v. MartinIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Wright v. ComptonIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Cox v. VanderkleedIndiana Supreme Court · 1863
  4. McGlone v. HaugerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
  5. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. GrebIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. City of Indianapolis v. MossIndiana Court of Appeals · 1920
  2. Schwab v. SchwabIndiana Court of Appeals · 1959
  3. Winchester v. Continental Can Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API