Legal Opinion

(PS) Gamino v. Evers

District Court, E.D. California

Decided August 29, 2024No. 2:23-cv-03036Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BRANDON MICHAEL GAMINO, No. 2:23-cv-03036-TLN-SCR 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 JON EVERS, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se in this action. This matter was accordingly referred to the 18 undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). Before the court are Plaintiff’s motion to proceed 19 in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2), First Amended Complaint (ECF No. 3), and motion requesting 20 action be taken (ECF No. 4). Plaintiff has submitted the necessary affidavit required by statute 21…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API