Legal Opinion

Excel Staffing Service, Inc. v. HP Reidsville, Inc.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 2, 2005No. COA04-1047PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEELMAN, Judge.

Filing an unverified answer to a complaint does not constitute a response to requests for admissions, even though some of the matters addressed are identical. Further, a corporation’s establishment of a subsidiary corporation for the purpose of limiting its liability is not per se an unfair and deceptive trade practice under Chapter 75.

Plaintiff, Excel Staffing Service, Inc., is a North Carolina corporation with its principal office in Greensboro. Defendants, HP Reidsville, Inc., HP/Management Services, Inc., HP/Operations Group, Inc., and HealthPrime, Inc., are Georgia…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Marshall v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. Howerton v. Arai Helmet, Ltd.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
  3. Lemons v. Old Hickory Council, Boy Scouts of America, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  4. Goins v. PuleoSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999
  5. Muse v. Charter Hospital of Winston-Salem, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ge Betz, Inc. v. ConradCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  2. Brown v. Refuel America, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  3. Dixon v. HillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  4. Taidoc Tech. Corp. v. Ok Biotech Co., LtdNorth Carolina Business Court · 2014
  5. Bartels v. Saber Healthcare Grp., LLCDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2018

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API