Excel Staffing Service, Inc. v. HP Reidsville, Inc.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
STEELMAN, Judge.
Filing an unverified answer to a complaint does not constitute a response to requests for admissions, even though some of the matters addressed are identical. Further, a corporation’s establishment of a subsidiary corporation for the purpose of limiting its liability is not per se an unfair and deceptive trade practice under Chapter 75.
Plaintiff, Excel Staffing Service, Inc., is a North Carolina corporation with its principal office in Greensboro. Defendants, HP Reidsville, Inc., HP/Management Services, Inc., HP/Operations Group, Inc., and HealthPrime, Inc., are Georgia…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Marshall v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- Howerton v. Arai Helmet, Ltd.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
- Lemons v. Old Hickory Council, Boy Scouts of America, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
- Goins v. PuleoSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999
- Muse v. Charter Hospital of Winston-Salem, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Ge Betz, Inc. v. ConradCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
- Brown v. Refuel America, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
- Dixon v. HillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
- Taidoc Tech. Corp. v. Ok Biotech Co., LtdNorth Carolina Business Court · 2014
- Bartels v. Saber Healthcare Grp., LLCDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2018
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.