Legal Opinion

Mergentime v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 31, 1938PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Citeiam.

The action arises out of an accident in the State of Maine, in which an automobile owned by plaintiff Lottye Mergentime and defendant’s truck were involved. Plaintiff James Mergentime, the operator of the automobile, and his brother, plaintiff Lee Mergentime, Jr., then an infant and a passenger, seek to recover damages for personal injuries. Plaintiff Lee Mergentime, the father, sues for medical expenses incurred in treating the infant’s injuries. Plaintiff Lottye Mergentime, the mother of Lee, Jr., and James, and the owner of the automobile, but who was not in it at the time of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gochee v. WagnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  2. Cherwien v. GeiterNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
  3. Weissman v. Banque De BruxellesNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  4. Heissenbuttel v. MeagherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
  5. Heissenbuttel v. . MeagherNew York Court of Appeals · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Mills v. GabrielAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
  2. In re MaakNew York Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Winnick v. Kupperman Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
  4. Mordecai v. HollisNew York Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Pinieri v. RosenbaumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API