Legal Opinion

Stouffer Corp. v. Winegardner & Hammons, Inc.

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided October 31, 1980No. C-1-80-542PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

SPIEGEL, District Judge:

This is an action for unfair competition in connection with the use of a service mark, commenced under 15 U.S.C. § 1125, and for unfair competition under the Ohio common law of trademarks and certain Ohio statutes. This Court’s jurisdiction of the federal cause of action has been invoked under 15 U.S.C. § 1121 and 28 U.S.C. § 1338, with pendent jurisdiction over the Ohio unfair competitions causes of action.

This matter is presently before the Court on plaintiff’s motion for a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lawrence Roth v. Bank of the CommonwealthCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
  2. Coffee Dan's, Inc. v. Coffee Don's Charcoal BroilerDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1969
  3. Shoppers Fair of Arkansas, Inc. v. The Sanders Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1964
  4. Anheuser-Busch, Inc., and Cross-Appellee v. Bavarian Brewing Company, and Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1959
  5. Beef & Brew, Inc. v. Beef & Brew, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 1974

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Major League Baseball Properties, Inc. v. Sed Non Olet Denarius, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1993
  2. ChiChi's Inc. v. Chi-Mex, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API