United States v. Stamp
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
TAMM, Circuit Judge:
In this case the six defendants, Walter R. Reynolds, Bertram G. Dienelt, Jr., Harlan E. Freeman, R. Marbury Stamp, A. Claiborne Leigh and E. Neil Rogers, were tried by a jury on a 13-count indictment in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. With the *762single exception of Dienelt they were all found guilty on each of the 13 counts of the indictment. The first count charged that, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371 (1964), the appellants and two other defendants1 conspired to violate D.C.Code § 22-1301 (1967) (false pretenses) and D.C.Code § 22-1401 (1967)…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Stirone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Russell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Ex Parte BainSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- United States v. Guillermo Novo Sampol, United States of America v. Alvin Ross Diaz, United States of America v. Ignacio Novo SampolCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Bruce Lusk Bass, IIICourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- United States v. CoppolaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975
- Waller v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
- United States v. Walter C. RobsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.