Legal Opinion

United States v. Stamp

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided December 20, 1971No. Nos. 24193, 24194, 24197, 24198PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TAMM, Circuit Judge:

In this case the six defendants, Walter R. Reynolds, Bertram G. Dienelt, Jr., Harlan E. Freeman, R. Marbury Stamp, A. Claiborne Leigh and E. Neil Rogers, were tried by a jury on a 13-count indictment in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. With the *762single exception of Dienelt they were all found guilty on each of the 13 counts of the indictment. The first count charged that, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371 (1964), the appellants and two other defendants1 conspired to violate D.C.Code § 22-1301 (1967) (false pretenses) and D.C.Code § 22-1401 (1967)…

2Cases cited56 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Stirone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Russell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Ex Parte BainSupreme Court of the United States · 1887

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. United States v. Guillermo Novo Sampol, United States of America v. Alvin Ross Diaz, United States of America v. Ignacio Novo SampolCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
  2. United States v. Bruce Lusk Bass, IIICourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  3. United States v. CoppolaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975
  4. Waller v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. United States v. Walter C. RobsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API