Legal Opinion
Adams v. City of Atl. City
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided February 13, 2018No. Civil Action No. 13–cv–7133 (JBS/AMD)PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SIMANDLE, Judge:
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter is before the Court on Defendant City of Atlantic City's ("Atlantic City") Motion for Summary Judgment [Docket Item 200], as well as Defendants Atlantic City Police Department ("ACPD") Officer Frank Timek, ACPD Officer Brent Dooley, ACPD Officer Kyle Eisenbeis, and ACPD Sergeant Daryl Hall's ("Individual Defendants") Motion for Summary Judgment [Docket Item 195]. In this case, Plaintiff Julius Adams ("Adams") claims his Fourth Amendment rights were violated when Atlantic City police officers conspired to use, and did use, excessive force against him…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- BEAM v. WOLFDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2023
- DAMARR-FARUQ v. CITY OF PLEASANTVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENTDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2025
- DIAZ v. CITY OF PASSAICDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2019
- EIVICH v. EAST GREENWICH TOWNSHIPDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2025
- FONG v. CITY OF NEWARKDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2023
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.