Legal Opinion
United States v. Gregg
District Court, D. South Dakota
Decided July 7, 2005No. CR 04-30068PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND OPINION DENYING MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL
KORNMANN, District Judge.
[¶ 1] Defendant (“Gregg”) was charged in the indictment with two counts, one for first degree murder and the second of using a firearm during a crime of violence. As will later appear, he was convicted of two counts. He filed a motion (Doc. 109) on February 1, 2005, seeking a new trial pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 33. Rule 33 authorizes the Court, upon the defendant’s motion, to “vacate any judgment and grant a new trial if the interest of justice so requires.” He also requested leave to supplement the motion with a brief in…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Schmuck v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Keeble v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Ex Parte BainSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Melvin White v. B. Jeffery Pence Natalee Schay, United States of America v. B. Jeffery Pence Natalee SchayCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Quentin Ira LincolnCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Fire Cloud v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2018
- United States v. LongDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2016