Legal Opinion

Lockwood v. State

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided March 9, 1979No. 3356PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Before BOOCHEVER, C. J., and RABI-NOWITZ, CONNOR, BURKE and MATTHEWS, JJ. BURKE, Justice.

This appeal presents two issues. The first is whether information presented to a superior court judge was sufficient to support his issuance of a search warrant. The second is whether in executing the warrant the police violated Alaska’s “knock and announce” rule. We hold that there was an adequate showing to justify issuance of the warrant and that the conduct of the police in its execution was lawful.

Following a trial by jury, appellant Steve J. Lockwood was adjudged guilty of possession, with…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Sabbath v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. JonesAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Schmid v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Rosa v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1981
  4. Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1983
  5. Wallace v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1997

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API