Legal Opinion

Moody v. Clark

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 18, 1954No. 6691PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FANNING, Justice.

Rex Lowell Clark, by next friend, sued C. Everett Dean and wife Rachel Jo Dean, William Dean and wife Virginia Dean, Mrs. Rosa Croley, George Henry Moody and .the City of Gilmer to recover damages for personal injuries. Upon a jury trial and submission on special issues, judgment, except as to Rosa Croley, was rendered for appellee Clark, awarding a recovery of $10,000. Moody contingently claimed indemnity and contribution against the City of Gilmer and indemnity against the Deans; all of which was denied. The judgment however decreed contribution as between Moody and the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. BighamTexas Supreme Court · 1896
  2. City of Dallas v. MaxwellTexas Commission of Appeals · 1923
  3. Seinsheimer v. BurkhartTexas Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. BallewTexas Commission of Appeals · 1933
  5. East Texas Motor Freight Lines v. LoftisTexas Supreme Court · 1949

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Price v. SeidlerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1966
  2. Robertson v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1966
  3. Bell v. ForeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
  4. Taylor v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
  5. Kettler v. HamptonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API