Legal Opinion
Paulausky v. Mayo Clinic
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided August 1, 2025No. 0:25-cv-00165Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA NICHOLE PAULAUSKY, Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM OF LAW AND v. ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR PARTIAL DISMISSAL Civil File No. 25-00165 (MJD/DLM) MAYO CLINIC, Defendant. Celeste E. Culberth and Leslie L. Lienemann, Culberth & Lienemann, LLP, Counsel for Plaintiff. Emily A. McNee and Leslie A. Bellwood, Littler Mendelson, P.C., Counsel for Defendant. I. INTRODUCTION This matter is before the Court on Defendant Mayo Clinic’s (“Mayo”) Motion for Partial Dismissal of Plaintiff Nichole Paulausky’s Complaint. II. BACKGROUND The following facts are relevant to…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Waffle House, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Joseph Osborn and Pamela Osborn, Individually and as Father and Mother and Guardians Ad Litem of Shawna Osborn v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
- Bigelow v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Zutz v. NelsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.