Karam v. New York State Liquor Authority
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Determination unanimously annulled on the law without costs and petition granted. Memorandum: The determination of the State Liquor Authority that petitioner had sold beer to a minor was based solely upon the hearsay statement of the minor, who did not appear at the hearing. Under the circumstances of the case, the hearsay statement did not constitute substantial evidence to sustain the Authority’s determination. Substantial evidence is " 'evidence on which responsible persons are accustomed to rely in serious affairs’ ” (People ex rel. Vega v Smith, 66 NY2d 130, 139, quoting from National…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People ex rel. Vega v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- 125 Bar Corp. v. State Liquor AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
3Cited by6 opinions
- McGillicuddy's Tap House, Ltd. v. New York State Liquor AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Ridge, Inc. v. New York State Liquor AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Ridge, Inc. v. New York State Liquor AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Fellowmen Community Development Corp. v. New York State Liquor AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Red Parrot Cabaret, Inc. v. State Liquor AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.