Legal Opinion

Fellowmen Community Development Corp. v. New York State Liquor Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 29, 1995PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Determination unanimously annulled on the law with costs and petition granted in accordance with the following Memorandum: The determination that petitioner caused or permitted alcoholic beverages to be sold or delivered to minors in violation of Alcoholic Beverage Control Law § 65 (1) is not supported by substantial evidence. Evidence of petitioner’s conduct consisted entirely of hearsay. Although the State Liquor Authority is entitled to consider hearsay evidence, such evidence, if " 'controverted seriously’ ”, may fail to provide the substantial evidence necessary to support the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. 125 Bar Corp. v. State Liquor AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
  2. Karam v. New York State Liquor AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McGillicuddy's Tap House, Ltd. v. New York State Liquor AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  2. Ridge, Inc. v. New York State Liquor AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  3. Ridge, Inc. v. New York State Liquor AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API