Fellowmen Community Development Corp. v. New York State Liquor Authority
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Determination unanimously annulled on the law with costs and petition granted in accordance with the following Memorandum: The determination that petitioner caused or permitted alcoholic beverages to be sold or delivered to minors in violation of Alcoholic Beverage Control Law § 65 (1) is not supported by substantial evidence. Evidence of petitioner’s conduct consisted entirely of hearsay. Although the State Liquor Authority is entitled to consider hearsay evidence, such evidence, if " 'controverted seriously’ ”, may fail to provide the substantial evidence necessary to support the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- 125 Bar Corp. v. State Liquor AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- Karam v. New York State Liquor AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
3Cited by3 opinions
- McGillicuddy's Tap House, Ltd. v. New York State Liquor AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Ridge, Inc. v. New York State Liquor AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Ridge, Inc. v. New York State Liquor AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999