Legal Opinion

American Locomotive Co. v. Histed

District Court, W.D. Missouri

Decided October 9, 1926No. 738PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REEVES, District Judge.

In this proceeding, the several defendants have separately, as well as jointly, filed their petitions for removal to this court, and the plaintiffs have correspondingly moved to remand as to each defendant. A brief statement of facts will be sufficient to justify the ruling here made.

At the time the suit was instituted, and at the present time, defendant William T. Kemper was and is receiver, under appointment of the District Court of the District of Kansas, for the Kansas City, Mexico & Orient Bailway Company, a corporation. This receivership was pending at all of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Matarazzo v. HustisDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1919

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ruff v. GayCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1933
  2. Newell v. ByramDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1927
  3. Ruff v. GayDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1933
  4. Thompson v. St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1934
  5. Potts v. ElliottDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API