Legal Opinion

Newell v. Byram

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided March 17, 1927PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOLYNEAUX, District Judge.

This is a motion to remand. This suit was removed to the federal court under Judicial Code, § 33 fComp.( St. § 1015), on the ground that it involved a civil suit brought against officers of the court of the United States on account of acts done by them under color of their office or in the performance of their duties as such officers.

H. E. Byram, Mark W. Potter, and Edward J. Brundage are receivers of the Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Company, so appointed by the United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, and by…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Barnette v. Wells Fargo Nevada National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Matarazzo v. HustisDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1919
  3. Slover v. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1926
  4. American Locomotive Co. v. HistedDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1926

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ruff v. GayCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1933
  2. Ruff v. GayDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1933
  3. Potts v. ElliottDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API