Newell v. Byram
District Court, D. Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
MOLYNEAUX, District Judge.
This is a motion to remand. This suit was removed to the federal court under Judicial Code, § 33 fComp.( St. § 1015), on the ground that it involved a civil suit brought against officers of the court of the United States on account of acts done by them under color of their office or in the performance of their duties as such officers.
H. E. Byram, Mark W. Potter, and Edward J. Brundage are receivers of the Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Company, so appointed by the United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, and by…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Barnette v. Wells Fargo Nevada National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Matarazzo v. HustisDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1919
- Slover v. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1926
- American Locomotive Co. v. HistedDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1926
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ruff v. GayCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1933
- Ruff v. GayDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1933
- Potts v. ElliottDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1945