Legal Opinion

Brizuela v. Calfarm Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 3, 2004No. B160875PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MOSK, J.

Plaintiff and appellant Sergio Brizuela (Brizuela) appeals from the trial court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of defendant and respondent CalFarm Insurance Company (CalFarm) in Brizuela’s action against CalFarm for breach of contract and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. In affirming the judgment we hold, as a matter of law, that Brizuela violated the requirement of the insurance policy that he submit to an examination under oath; that the insurer could on that basis deny his claim without a showing of prejudice; that the availability of a…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Waller v. Truck Insurance Exchange, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Gruenberg v. Aetna InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Hersant v. Department of Social ServicesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  5. Campbell v. Allstate Ins. Co.California Supreme Court · 1963

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Progressive West Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  2. EFG Bank AG v. AXA Equitable Life Ins. Co.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
  3. Benavides v. State Farm General Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 2006
  4. Marentes v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2016
  5. Ram v. Infinity Select InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2011

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API