Legal Opinion

HENA v. VANDEGRIFT

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 10, 2020No. 2:18-cv-00762Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ALLEN HENA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) Civil Action No. 18-762 v. ) ) RYAN VANDEGRIFT, ) ) ) Defendants. ) OPINION CONTI, Senior District Judge. I. Introduction This diversity action arises out of a real estate transaction involving the purchase of 1645 Pegher Lane in Sewickley, Pennsylvania (the “Pegher-Lane property”), by plaintiff Allen Hena (“Hena” or “plaintiff”) from pro se defendant Ryan Vandegrift (“Vandegrift” or “defendant”). Hena in the complaint alleges that Vandegrift made untruthful statements in a Seller…

2Cases cited56 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API