Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Elbert

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 23, 1914No. Appeal, No. 49PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal, No. 49, Jau. T., 1914, by defendants, from judgment of C. P. Berks Co., Jan. T., 1914, No. 77, ousting defendants from the office of Commissioners of Water for the City of Reading, in the case of Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, ex rel. Ira W. Stratton, Mayor, and George P. Eisenbrown, Peter S. Holl, Jacob H. McConnell and B. Frank Ruth, Members of Council of the City of Reading, v. Edward Elbert, Frederic P. Heller, John H. Close, and A. Ellsworth Leinbach.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 49, Jau. T., 1914, by defendants, from judgment of C. P. Berks Co., Jan. T., 1914, No. 77, ousting defendants from the office of Commissioners of Water for the City of Reading, in the case of Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, ex rel. Ira W. Stratton, Mayor, and George P. Eisenbrown, Peter S. Holl, Jacob H. McConnell and B. Frank Ruth, Members of Council of the City of Reading, v. Edward Elbert, Frederic P. Heller, John H. Close, and A. Ellsworth Leinbach. Quo warranto to determine title to office. Endlich, P. J., filed the following opinion: A careful study of all the questions raised…

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

The judgment is affirmed on the opinion of the learned president judge of the Common Pleas.

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Central Iron & Steel Co. v. HarrisburgSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  2. Commonwealth ex rel. Heinly v. MarksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
  3. Davison v. ErieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  4. School District v. SchnablySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  5. City of Lancaster v. Brown, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lancaster County1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API