Legal Opinion

Stockton v. Rogers

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided May 15, 1896PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by defendant from affirmance by the City Court, General Term, of a judgment rendered at Trial Term.

1Opinion of the CourtMcAdam, J.

The Joy & Seliger Co., a New Jersey corporation, sold to the defendant goods consisting of ladies’ belts, etc., at the agreed price of $1,706.77. The sale was consummated at the factory of the corporation at Newark, N. J., and the delivery made at the defendant’s, place of business in New York city, May .22, 1893, where the goods were receipted for by a son of the defendant, who was a clerk in his employ. •. The corporation failed, and on May 17, 1893, J. Frank Fort was appointed receiver; he qualified-May 22d, and the order and qualification were filed the day following. On August 1,' 1893,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. McKnight v. . DunlopNew York Court of Appeals · 1851
  2. Garfield v. ParisSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Arnstein v. HaulenbeekNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1890
  4. Cross v. . O'DonnellNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  5. Remick v. SandfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Southern Railway Co. v. HowertonIndiana Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Young v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1965
  3. Demond v. University of HawaiiHawaii Supreme Court · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API