Gates v. Albin
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
HODGES, Justice.
The questions presented are: whether the trial court erred because it did not award alimony; whether the retirement fund of the husband should be considered in the division of jointly acquired property; and if the husband should be required to pay the wife’s attorney fees.
I
After a marriage which lasted approximately nine years, 1 the parties, Goldie Marie Albin Gates, appellant, and Bob R. Albin, appellee, were granted a divorce and their jointly acquired property was equally divided. However, the trial court expressly excluded the husband’s pension fund. 2 The wife asserts…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Carpenter v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
- Stansberry v. StansberrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
- Stuart v. StuartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
3Cited by7 opinions
- Stokes v. StokesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
- Rice v. RiceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- Greer v. GreerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
- Clifton v. CliftonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
- Clifton v. CliftonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.