Legal Opinion

Gates v. Albin

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 26, 1983No. 58298PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HODGES, Justice.

The questions presented are: whether the trial court erred because it did not award alimony; whether the retirement fund of the husband should be considered in the division of jointly acquired property; and if the husband should be required to pay the wife’s attorney fees.

I

After a marriage which lasted approximately nine years, 1 the parties, Goldie Marie Albin Gates, appellant, and Bob R. Albin, appellee, were granted a divorce and their jointly acquired property was equally divided. However, the trial court expressly excluded the husband’s pension fund. 2 The wife asserts…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Carpenter v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
  2. Stansberry v. StansberrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
  3. Stuart v. StuartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Stokes v. StokesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
  2. Rice v. RiceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
  3. Greer v. GreerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
  4. Clifton v. CliftonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
  5. Clifton v. CliftonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API