Legal Opinion
In re New York, N. H. & H. R.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided June 3, 1942No. 16562PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HINCKS, District Judge.
Since the allowance of claims for fees and expenses in a reorganization and the amounts allowed may depend among other things upon the outcome of the proceedings and various phases thereof, after ordering the plan returned to the Interstate Commerce Commission for further consideration the situation appeared to me too fluid to permit of a just and final appraisal of all the factors involved in the pending applications. However, the subsequent course of the proceedings before the Commission convinces me that the ultimate shape of the reorganization is now sufficiently…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Benedict v. RatnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Irving-Austin Bldg. Corp. v. CunninghamCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1938
- Pennish v. A. Herz, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1936
- In Re Paramount Publix CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
- Teasdale v. Sefton Nat. Fibre Can Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1936
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Matter of New York, New Haven & Hartford R. Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1976
- In the Matter of Boston & Providence Railroad Corporation, Debtor. Richard Joyce Smith, Trustee, Joseph B. Hyman, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1970
- In Re Continental Airlines, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 1985
- Southern Ry. Co. v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1944
- Southern Ry. Co. v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1944