Legal Opinion
Morris v. Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co.
District Court, N.D. Indiana
Decided November 20, 1947No. Civil Action No. 777PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SWYGERT, District Judge.
This is a proceeding under the Selective Training and Service Act of 1940, as amended, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 308(e). On October 9, 1947, this cause came on to be tried before the Court without a jury. From the evidence introduced by both the petitioner and the respondent in said trial and from the exhibits on file in said case, the Court finds as follows:
1. Petitioner is a resident of Peru, Indiana, and the respondent is a corporation doing business at Peru, Indiana.
2. Petitioner was employed by the respondent on January 12, 1940, as a telegrapher in Peru, Indiana.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Fishgold v. Sullivan Drydock & Repair Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Hewitt v. System Federation No. 152 of Ry. Employees' Dept. of American Federation of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1947
3Cited by2 opinions
- Roy Paul Pomrening v. United Air Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971
- Morris v. Chesapeake & Ohio Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1948