Randall v. Chicago & Grand Trunk Railway Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Err or to Eaton; Smith, J. Case by William A. Randall against the Chicago & Grand Trunk Railway Company for personal injuries. From a judgment- for plaintiff, defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtLong, C. J.
This action was brought to recover damages for injuries claimed to have been sustained by plaintiff by being compelled by a brakeman to jump from a *116freight train, while in motion, belonging to defendant. The injury occurred March 19,1894. The plaintiff, without permission of the defendant, got upon one of defendant’s freight trains at Charlotte, this State. When the train arrived near Olivet Hill, plaintiff was discovered by one of defendant’s brakemen between two cars, holding onto the projecting iron at the end of the car. Plaintiff claims that, while the train was running at a high rate of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- International & Great Northern Railway Co. v. AndersonTexas Supreme Court · 1891
- Farber v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1893
- Bess v. Chesapeake & Ohio RailroadWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1891
- Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. PetersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
- Pennsylvania Co. v. DeanIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Maxson v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
- Newkirk v. Oregon-Washington Railroad & Navigation Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1929
- Chicago R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. BrackmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1898
- Verlinde v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
- Allen v. Robert Gage Coal Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1922
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.