Capco Acquisub, Inc. v. Greka Energy Corporation
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BUSTAMANTE, Chief Judge.
{1} This ease requires us to determine whether the district court erred in denying Appellants’ motion for extension of time in which to file a notice of appeal under Rule 12-201(E)(2) NMRA. We conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion. Accordingly, we affirm.
BACKGROUND
{2} This appeal originates from a judgment entered in a case concerning claims related to oil and gas properties in Lea County, New Mexico. The judgment involved two separate lawsuits that were consolidated for trial: Capco Acquisub, Inc. v. Greka Energy…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Kelly Inn No. 102, Inc. v. KapnisonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1992
- Govich v. North American Systems, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
- Trujillo v. SerranoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
- Handmaker v. HenneyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. PeppersNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1990
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Skeen v. BoylesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2009
- Schultz ex rel. Schultz v. Pojoaque Tribal Police DepartmentNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2010
- Schultz v. POJOAQUE TRIBAL POLICE DEPT.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2010
- Rio Grande Kennel Club v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2008
- Kinder Morgan CO2 Co. v. State Taxation & Revenue DepartmentNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2008
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.