Legal Opinion

Leckrone v. City of Salem

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 29, 1987No. 5-85-0604PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Jones

Plaintiffs appeal a judgment entered upon the granting of defendant’s motion to dismiss for failure to state a cause of action as to three counts of their four-count complaint. In its judgment upon the three counts of the complaint, the trial court, sua sponte, made a finding pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 304(a) (87 Ill. 2d R. 304(a)) that there was no reason to delay appeal. The defendant did not cross-appeal as to the denial of its motion to dismiss the fourth count of plaintiffs’ complaint.

The causes of action the plaintiffs sought to assert in their complaint arose from defendant’s…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Burtell v. First Charter Service Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Alfred B. Freeman v. Chicago Musical Instrument Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
  3. People Ex Rel. General Motors Corp. v. BuaIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
  4. People Ex Rel. Scott v. SilversteinIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
  5. People v. GeroldIllinois Supreme Court · 1914

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Roark v. MacOupin Creek Drainage DistrictAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000
  2. Musgrave v. FrenchIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Gass v. Metro-East Sanitary DistrictAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989
  4. National Wrecking Co. v. Midwest Terminal Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  5. Dirksen v. City of SpringfieldDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 1994

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API