Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Dawson

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 11, 2014PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

MUNDY, J.:

Appellant, Derrick D. Dawson, appeals from the May 9, 2013 order denying his motion to dismiss based upon alleged violations of the compulsory joinder rule and the Double Jeopardy Clauses of the Federal and Pennsylvania Constitutions.1 After careful review, we affirm.

The trial court summarized the relevant facts and procedural history of this case as follows.

[Appellant] was charged at criminal actions numbers 418-417 of 2012, 420, 421, and 423 of 2012 with Possession with Intent to Deliver, Criminal Use of Communication Facility, and Possession of a Controlled Substance.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BracaliellySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. Commonwealth v. FithianSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  3. Commonwealth v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Commonwealth v. MinnisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  5. Commonwealth v. SimmerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BallSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Com. v. Don Bullian, M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
  3. Com. v. Baldwin, T.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  4. Com. v. Davis, A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  5. Com. v. Don Bullian, M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API