Legal Opinion

Lloyd v. Simons

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 10, 1903No. Nos. 13,522, 13,523—(178,181)PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Action in the district court for McLeod county to prove and establish an unrecorded lost deed and to determine the adverse claims of defendants to the land therein described. The case was tried before Qvale, J., who found in favor of plaintiffs. From a judgment entered pursuant to the findings defendants Anna E- Simons and husband and M. E. Hodder separately appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.

This was an equitable action, brought to prove and establish an unrecorded and alleged lost deed of eighty acres of land, which deed, it was claimed, was made, executed, and delivered in the summer of 1877 by one William F. Furlong to James Edwards, and also for the purpose of having the title to the eighty acres declared to be in plaintiffs, and of having it adjudged that defendants, Henry E. and Anna L. Simons, M. A. Zella, M. E. Hodder, and Isaac W. Arnold, had and have no-right, title, or interest therein.

The record is very complicated, because a great deal of irrelevant and useless…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Langford v. IssenhuthSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1912
  2. In Re Estate of ForsytheSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
  3. Engenmoen v. LutroeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
  4. Lloyd v. SimonsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  5. Willett v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1922

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API