Legal Opinion

Matter of Fischer (Saportas, Inc.)

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 5, 1942PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lehman, Ch. J.

The claimant was employed as an “ alteration finisher of dresses ” in the shop in which Lili Saportas, Inc., conducts its business of selling “ ready-to-wear ” dresses. There customers may have dresses which have been sold to them altered and fitted. An additional charge is made for that service and is included in bills sent to customers. Lili Saportas, Inc., does not hire the fitters or seamstresses who make these alterations for its customers. It has engaged one Lillian E. Epstein to perform that work through her own employees, for the convenience of the customers. Lillian E.…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wolfe v. BryantTennessee Supreme Court · 1944
  2. J. Goldsmith & Sons Co. v. HakeTennessee Supreme Court · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API