Legal Opinion

1890 Adam Clayton Powell LLC v. Penant

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided June 16, 2016Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

Final judgment, entered May 13, 2015, affirmed, with $25 costs.

In sustaining the possessory judgment awarded to landlord on the holdover petition, we reject tenant’s specific argument that landlord failed to establish that the apartment’s occupants were not permitted residents pursuant to Real Property Law § 235-f. The trial evidence showed, and it was essentially undisputed, that three unrelated roommates resided with tenant in the subject four-bedroom apartment, in violation of the lease provision limiting occupancy to “tenant or tenants named above and by the immediate…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rose v. Spa Realty AssociatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Jefpaul Garage Corp. v. Presbyterian HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Excel Graphics Technologies, Inc. v. CFG/AGSCB 75 Ninth AvenueAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  4. Paramount Leasehold, L.P. v. 43rd Street Deli, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  5. Roxborough Apartments Corp. v. BeckerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API