United States v. Adam Fernandez
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Per curiam
In these consolidated appeals from the Western District of Arkansas the appellants all challenge the constitutionality of a provision of the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (SORNA), 42 U.S.C. § 16901 et seq., under which they were convicted. Appellants argue that SORNA violates the nondelegation doctrine of the United States Constitution by giving the Attorney General authority to determine its applicability to sex offenders convicted before the statute’s enactment. The district courts 1 upheld the constitutionality of the Act. The defendants appeal, and we affirm.
SORNA…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Yakus v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- A. L. A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Panama Refining Co. v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- National Broadcasting Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Union Pacific Railroad v. United States Department of Homeland SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. William MeffordCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
- Bhatti v. Fed. Hous. Fin. AgencyDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2018
- United States v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- United States v. Bruce Charles TollefsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.