Legal Opinion
Kenzora v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided May 25, 2016No. 10-669VPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 (“Vaccine Act”), 42 U.S.C. § 300aa~ 1 to -34 (2012); Motion for Relief from Judgment, RCFC 60(b); Vaccine Rule 36.
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
GRIGGSBY, Judge
I. INTRODUCTION
Petitioner, Alex B. Kerizora, seeks review of a September 25, 2015 decision of the special master denying his motion for relief from judgment, pursuant to Vaccine Rule 36. Because the record before the Court shows that the special master’s decision was not arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law, the Court DENIES petitioner’s motion…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Gonzalez v. CrosbySupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Ackermann v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Michael Lampe and Carolyn Lampe, Individually and as Next Friends of Rachael Lampe, a Minor v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- Robert James Lubben v. Selective Service System Local Board No. 27Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1972
- James M. Patton and Joann Patton, Legal Guardians for Thomas Edward Patton v. Secretary of the Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Kollasch v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
- P.S. v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2023