Collateral Finance Co. v. Braud
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Friend
In a garnishment proceeding instituted in the municipal court by plaintiff .against defendant, as garnishee, the latter answered “no funds.” Plaintiff contested the answer, which was subsequently set for hearing, and upon trial the court discharged the garnishee. Plaintiff appeals.
The uncontroverted evidence discloses that November 28, 1936, Meier Motors Company, Inc., executed a chattel mortgage on certain personal property to the Universal Dealers Company, which was not recorded until January 12, 1937. Subsequently, and prior to January 29, 1937, Universal Dealers Company took possession of…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Fearey v. CummingsMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
- Ruggles v. CannedyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- First Nat. Bank of Buchanan County v. ConnettCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
- Landis v. McDonaldMissouri Court of Appeals · 1901
- In re BotheCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re Consorto Const. Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954
- Barber v. Reina Nash Motor CompanyWyoming Supreme Court · 1953
- Rolando v. EverettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- In Re Consorto Const. Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954
- Myrick v. KeelAppellate Court of Illinois · 1968