Legal Opinion

In Re Consorto Const. Co., Inc

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided May 3, 1954No. 11216_1Published

1Opinion of the Court

212 F.2d 676

In re CONSORTO CONST. CO., Inc.

No. 11216.

United States Court of Appeals,

Third Circuit.

Argued Feb. 1, 1954.

Decided May 3, 1954.

Robert E. Jones, Philadelphia, Pa. (Rawle & Henderson, Thomas F. Mount, Joseph W. Henderson, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellant.

Nathan Lavine, Philadelphia, Pa. (Edward H. Cushman, Alexander B. Adelman, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellee.

Before GOODRICH, McLAUGHLIN and HASTIE, Circuit Judges.

HASTIE, Circuit Judge.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ruggles v. CannedyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  2. In Re Consorto Const. Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954
  3. First National Bank v. ReeseCourt of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · 1947
  4. Barber v. Reina Nash Motor CompanyWyoming Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Roberts' & Pyne's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1869

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API