Legal Opinion
United States v. James Arthur Willis
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided August 20, 1973No. 72-1704PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROSS, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction, after a jury verdict, finding James Arthur Willis guilty of violating the provisions of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2421 and 1952. We affirm.
Willis was tried on a two count indictment: 1) transporting two women, Rose Marie Williams and Ray dene Murray, in interstate commerce for the purpose of prostitution in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2421, and 2) having traveled and caused travel in interstate commerce to facilitate prostitution enterprises illegal under state law in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1952. The Government’s bill of particulars…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Harrington v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Schneble v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Milton v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- United States v. Shannon Wayne Agofsky, United States of America v. Joseph Anthony AgofskyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Donald J. QuinnCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
- United States v. James Anthony Michaels, IIICourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Rodger WagonerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983
- United States v. Louis Eugene Cunningham, and John HechtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.