Legal Opinion
German Auto Parts, Inc. v. Bureau of Labor & Industries
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided February 26, 1992No. 20-90; CA A68306PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*524DEITS, J.
Petitioner, employer of respondent Day, fired him for reporting safety and health hazards in the work place to a state agency. Day filed an unlawful employment practice complaint with the Bureau of Labor and Industries (BOLI), which found that petitioner’s action violated ORS 654.062(5). Part of the relief that BOLI ordered was an award of lost wages. Petitioner seeks review. Its sole assignment of error is that BOLI erred by not offsetting from the lost wages award unemployment compensation benefits that Day received during the relevant time. We affirm.
Petitioner relies on Filter v.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Seibel v. Liberty Homes, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1988
- Filter v. City of VernoniaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
3Cited by6 opinions
- Potvin v. Seven Elms, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1993
- Colson v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- Zottola v. Three Rivers School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- German Auto Parts, Inc. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- Zottola v. THREE RIVERS SCHOOL DISTRICTCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.