Legal Opinion

State v. Piekkola

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 23, 1976No. File 11669Published

1Opinion of the Court

241 N.W.2d 563 (1976)

STATE of South Dakota, Appellant,

v.

Kenneth PIEKKOLA, Respondent.

No. 11669.

Supreme Court of South Dakota.

April 23, 1976.

William J. Janklow, Atty. Gen., Doyle D. Estes, Asst. Atty. Gen., Pierre, for appellant.

Thomas E. Carr, of Stephens, Quinn, Carr & Tschetter, P.C., Belle Fourche, for respondent.

WINANS, Justice.

A state statute under which Defendant-Respondent had been convicted was declared by this Court to be unconstitutional. Defendant petitioned the lower court to return to him the fine and the court costs imposed on and paid out by him upon his guilty plea, this…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. People v. MeyerowitzIllinois Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Conway v. HumbertSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Hurley v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
  4. United States v. Jack L. Lewis, United States of America v. James L. WillozCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
  5. Mullen v. DwightSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1919

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API