Legal Opinion
Seligson v. Plum Tree, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided July 19, 1973No. Civ. A. 71-1998PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
JOSEPH S. LORD, III, Chief Judge.
This is an action for alleged violation of the antitrust laws, arising out of a franchise agreement between plaintiffs and defendant, The Plum Tree, Inc. (“Plum Tree”). Defendants have moved to dismiss plaintiffs’ second amended complaint (“the complaint”) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, and failure to assert these claims as a mandatory counterclaim to Plum Tree, Inc. v. Seligson, et al., Civil Action No. 71-1780. Defendants also have moved to drop certain parties and to…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- United States v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- International Salt Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Fortner Enterprises, Inc. v. United States Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Gianni v. Russell Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Freedman v. Amalgamated Sugar Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1976
- Zanakis-Pico v. Cutter Dodge, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2002
- Mailand v. BurckleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Tunis Brothers Company, Inc. v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Seligson v. Plum Tree, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.