Legal Opinion
Smart Style Industries, Inc. v. Pennsylvania General Insurance
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 10, 1996No. 95 Civ. 10095 (DC)PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CHIN, District Judge.
In this diversity action, plaintiffs Smart Style Industries, Inc. (“Smart Style”) and H.W. Carter & Sons, Inc. (“H.W. Carter”) seek reimbursement of legal fees incurred during an underlying trademark action, H.W. Carter & Sons, Inc. and American Marketing Enterprises Inc. v. The William Carter Co., 913 F.Supp. 796 (S.D.N.Y.1996) (Chin, J.) (the “Underlying Action”), pursuant to an insurance policy issued by defendant' Pennsylvania General Insurance Company (“Penn General”). Plaintiffs have moved for judgment on the pleadings under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(c) or, in the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Seaboard Surety Co. v. Gillette Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Mighty Midgets, Inc. v. Centennial InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Goldberg v. Lumber Mutual Casualty InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
- City of Johnstown, New York v. Bankers Standard Insurance Company, Pacific Employers Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Hartford Fire Insurance v. Vita Craft Corp.District Court, D. Kansas · 2012
- United Parcel Service v. Lexington Insurance GroupDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Hester v. Navigators InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- IBP, Inc. v. National Union Fire Ins. Co. of PittsburghDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2003
- Smart Style Industries, Inc. v. Pennsylvania General InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.