Legal Opinion
Smart Style Industries, Inc. v. Pennsylvania General Insurance
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 4, 1996No. 95 Civ. 10095 (DC)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION
CHIN, District Judge.
On July 10, 1996, I issued an opinion in this insurance coverage case granting in part and denying in part the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. Smart Style Industries, Inc. v. Pennsylvania General Ins. Co., 930 F.Supp. 159 (S.D.N.Y.1996). I held that plaintiffs Smart Style Industries, Inc. and H.W. Carter & Sons, Inc. (“H.W. Carter”) were entitled to be reimbursed for certain attorneys’ fees and costs incurred after March 6, 1995 in the underlying action. See H.W. Carter & Sons, Inc. v. William Carter Co., 913 F.Supp. 796 (S.D.N.Y.1996).
Plain…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- H.W. Carter & Sons, Inc. v. William Carter Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Smart Style Industries, Inc. v. Pennsylvania General InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bovis Lend Lease LMB, Inc. v. Royal Surplus Lines InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Tri-Star Pictures, Inc. v. UngerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- In Re Tutu Water Wells Contamination LitigationDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 1999