Legal Opinion
State v. DeCloux
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided August 6, 1965No. 39521PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Murphy, Justice.
This matter is before us on appeal from an order of the district court denying defendant’s motion to vacate a judgment of conviction. It appears that on November 29, 1962, a jury returned a verdict finding defendant guilty of grand larceny in the second degree in violation of Minn. St. 1961, § 622.06. He was sentenced the same date. The petition to vacate the judgment of conviction is designated as a petition for a writ of coram nobis.
No appeal was taken from the judgment of conviction. We held in State v. Pruitt, 264 Minn. 243, 119 N. W. (2d) 32, that an order denying a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Townsend v. SainSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Sanders v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- State Ex Rel. Dinneen v. TahashSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- State v. PruittSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
3Cited by15 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Holm v. TahashSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- Cable v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
- State Ex Rel. Smith v. TahashSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- Doan v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
- State Ex Rel. Danielsen v. TahashSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.