Legal Opinion

Jeremy Fontanez v. Colette Peters and Warden Rokosky

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided November 24, 2025No. 1:24-cv-03392Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND JEREMY FONTANEZ, Petitioner, v. Civil Action No.: MJM-24-3392 COLETTE PETERS and WARDEN ROKOSKY, Respondents. MEMORANDUM Jeremy Fontanez filed this Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 2241

challenging the amount of his wages taken to make payments to the restitution owed pursuant to the judgment in his criminal case. ECF No. 1. Respondents1 filed a Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment on May 27, 2025. ECF No. 9. Fontanez opposed the motion.2 ECF No. 13. Respondents replied. ECF No.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

Rumsfeld v. PadillaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
Carlos Pelaez-Edison Carmona v. United States Bureau of PrisonsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
McClung v. ShearinCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2004
United States v. Sandra ClaytonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
United States v. Philip NormanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.